Archive for May, 2005

Music since 1960: Grisey: Quatre chants pour franchir le seuil

Forty years of modern composition and what this music means to me

Index here.

Astute readers will know that this is a work that completely blew me away when I first heard it January 1999. I was reading some Music and Letters reviews from the early 1970s on Monday, and one critic – from memory it may have been Henry Raynor – suggested that most of us, if we’re lucky, see about a dozen concerts that stay with us through our lives. The first performance of Quatre chants, alongside the latest incarnation of Boulez’s Sur incises and a Wolfgang Rihm work I no longer remember the name of, was one of my dozen, no question. Since then, I’ve attempted sporadically to find a recording to little success (although I’ve not tried recently, so one may be out there now – I’m in Paris next month, so I’ll have a nose round the Pompidou music shop. Update: Charlie Quidnunc points out that a recording is available at that obscure emporium, Amazon. Thanks!). The work crystallised for me a number of ideas about music that are important in how I see and hear things 6 years later. One of the most memorable elements of that performance was the great rack of gongs stretched across the back of the stage – a 15-note gong ‘keyboard’ in fact. Most of the piece is extremely quiet, and at several points the percussionist in charge of this giant metallophone has to play rapid, pianissimo, arpeggios across the full range of the gongs spread in front of him. The precise gymnastics of this, to create an effect that was barely audible, was hugely impressive, and from that point I was convinced of the importance of the visual and the physical aspects to so much successful music.

For the re-presenting of the work, with the original forces of London Sinfonietta, George Benjamin and Valadine Anderson singing the soprano part, at Monday’s concert, the linear gong arrangement that I remembered had been reconsidered as a three-sided cage for the player. Actually, I thought this worked just as well – you just had to spin, rather than leap, to hit all the notes. As for everything else, it stood up well against the enhancing effects of memory, and just confirmed for me that this really is one of the most important concert works of the last decade. It’s certainly the most shattering I know of – I wasn’t the only member of the audience left absolutely shell-shocked by the end, and Benjamin, great musician that he is, gave us a full 15 seconds of silence before anyone even dared applaud.

The four sections of the work (its title roughly translates as ‘four songs for the crossing of the threshold’) deal with the deaths of the angel, civilisation, the voice and humanity respectively, and set texts from Guez-Ricord, The Hours of Night, fragments from an archaeological catalogue of the Egyptian Sarcophagi of the Middle Empire, two lines by the 6th-century Greek poetess Erinna, and an extract from the Epic of Gilgamesh. It’s a great set of texts – the second movement is just a litany of entries in the archaeological catalogue “811 and 812: (almost entirely disappeared) / 814: ‘Now that you rest for eternity … ‘ / 809: (destroyed) / 868 and 869: (almost entirely destroyed) …” Find me a more unintentionally moving text than that. These are set to an almost post-minimal series of three-note patterns – very slow – played with microtonal colourings throughout the ensemble. For Grisey, whose works to this point were generally glittering, intricate collisions of timbre and rhythm, it is, as Benjamin said on the night, a very courageous work. This movement comprises almost nothing, yet it is one of the most immediate emotional cores of the work.

The first song, The Death of the Angel, is hardly less extraordinary. The four songs are separated by interludes, the hiss of a bass drum skin being brushed in large circles, a noise that grows from the ambient sounds of auditorium air conditioning and audience breathing. This is how the work opens too, and the sound becomes the slow whoosh of unpitched air through wind and brass. From this impulse Grisey constructs an intricate web of note patterns, eternally descending. Aside from the singer, the noise level never rises above the barely audible. Adding an additional layer of effect, every player seems to have multiple instruments, mutes and other paraphernalia to deal with. These have to be changed on an almost constant basis. The stage never stops fidgeting (part of me thinks that all this written-in tinkering must be a wind player’s dream). With the sound level so low, and each performer in the small ensemble very exposed, the tension of changing, from say, one sax to the next to the next every few bars is palpable. The visual and aural effect is as delicate and intricate as unpicking a spider’s web.

The tension is maintained at this borderline-unbearable pitch – it’s like working with your fingers at something very small and very precise: after a certain time you have to make a large movement just to clear your head. The beginning of the fourth song sounds as though it might be this large movement: the bass drum interlude that has punctuated the spaces between each song so far returns for a last time, and grows into a fast percussive tattoo of repeated notes, shared between the three percussionists. But what looks like the release of tension that has been expected for the last half an hour never fully materialises; the drum sounds remain so neutral, so flatly percussive and regular, that instead of being released, our tensions are just sent on a different trajectory. What we really want, after all these hints at sound, is a rich noise, something to ease our hyper-sensitised ears into – the chorale from Stravinsky’s Symphonies of Winds, or Messiaen’s L’Ascension; even a nice chord on the vibraphone would do. But dry drum patterns – word-painting the lines from The Epic of Gilgamesh “For six days and seven nights / Squalls, Pelting rains / Hurricanes and Flood / Continued to ravage the earth” – aren’t making anyone feel comfortable. Finally, “When the seventh day arrived”, the sea is calmed “into stillness”.

I looked about:
Silence reigned!
All mankind had been
Returned to clay;
And the flat liquid
Resembled a terrace.

Some relief is offered – again it feels like true relief at first – by a chiming two-part line in microtonal (just intonation?) violin and cello accompanying these words. They are the first real pitches in several minutes, and they resemble a shaft of light, even if the way out remains obscured. Only at the very last does the music finally allow the scent of fresh air “I opened a window / And daylight fell on my cheek … ” Grisey described this final lullaby as “Music for the dawn of a humanity finally disencumbered of the nightmare,” although he himself cautiously added “I dare hope that this lullaby will not be among those we shall sing tomorrow to the first human clones as we perforce reveal to them the indefensible genetic and psychological violence committed against them by a humanity desperately seeking new taboos upon which to ground itself.” A mighty work both of, and for our times, then.

Leave a Comment

More on Hyperion/Sawkins

Just wanted to flag up that Galen H. Brown at Sequenza 21 has also, more lucidly than I, explained the arguments for how Hyperion were wrong in appealing their case, and Sawkins is right to claim copyright infringement. OK, case closed on this one.

Leave a Comment

Me me me: Meme me

So, The Standing Room has passed on to me one of the many meme batons doing the rounds at the moment…. [Cracks knuckles] Right…

Total volume of music on your computer?

I’ve actually got two computers with music on them – a desktop Mac and a company laptop. The Mac is telling me 1626 songs (8.59GB); the laptop is much less than it was since I filled up the harddrive over the weekend and had to delete a bunch of stuff; they’re mostly CD-length mixes cos that’s the machine with the burner. I don’t tend to put much music on my computers – at my desk I listen as much to minidiscs (I have dozens of those) as anything.

Last CD you bought?

Erm. It was either Public Image Limited Metal Box or Tadeusz Baird Dzieła [Works]; both were from eBay. Last record bought was Giorgio Moroder’s soundtrack to Midnight Express from a local charity shop.

Song currently playing?

Boom Boom Bashment mix by John Eden and Paul Meme.

Five songs I listen to a lot or that mean a lot to me?

Martha and the Vandellas: ‘Dancing in the Street’. Along with ‘Superstition’ and ‘I Want you Back’ this is a permament fixture on my desert island list. It gets the nod here because it’s the one I’m listening to most at the moment.

Olivier Messiaen: Turangalîla-Symphonie. Stretching the definition of ’song’ somewhat, but since first hearing this as a teenager this has long been one of my favourite 20th-century works. When I first played it to milady and she laughed out loud at the orgiastic bad taste extravaganza of the finale, I knew she was special.

Gene: ‘Does he have a name’ (from Libertine). A lost pinnacle of the post-Britpop years and a magnificent song, one that forges a perfect alliance between music and lyrics. The strings at the fadeout, whose harmonies distort and damage the musical space, are the perfect image of a heartbroken man fighting to keep his composure. Gets me every time.

Penderecki: St Luke Passion. Something of an odd one this, as it probably wouldn’t ever share my desert island with me, but as one of the central planks of my thesis it certainly figures as both something I listen to a lot and that means a lot to me.

Manic Street Preachers: ‘Motorcycle Emptiness’. The favourite song of a close friend who is no longer among us.

Five people to whom I’m passing the baton?

Much as I like receiving them, I hate imposing these things on people so I’m going to duck this one – rather than single anyone out anyone that wants can follow on.

Leave a Comment

Classical music makes you dumber

Two very thought-provoking points made by Greg Sandow recently:

As I read this crap [a festival press release full of the usual empty hype] I started to wonder whether there just might be a reverse Mozart effect. Maybe classical music makes us dumber. Meanwhile, if we believe Stephen Johnson’s new book, pop culture gets smarter and smarter.

and

The media, as time goes on, covers classical music less and less. A lot of people in our field complain about that. Sometimes they blame the media, as if all these editors and writers and producers — many in their thirties and forties, precisely the people we know we’re not reaching — had some obligation to cover us, which they shamefully neglect.

But in fact, as some smart classical music publicists explained to me many years ago, the problem is the opposite of this: People in the media are getting smarter, in part because there’s more art for them to think about, more theater companies, dance companies, museums (not to mention everything in popular culture).

A reverse Mozart effect? Well, since the ‘true’ Mozart effect was thoroughly refuted as a load of old bunkum, it’s just possible…

Leave a Comment

Susumu Yokota: symbol

One of the most interesting upcoming releases is probably Japanese electronica musician Susumu Yokota’s 25th (twenty-fifth!) album, Symbol, out on 6th June. Yokota is, for my money, one of the most subtle, inventive artists making ambient-ish electronica. Normally I’d recommend any album of his with absolute confidence – I bought several on the strength of hearing just one track from Sakura (alongside Grinning Cat probably his best record), and didn’t hit a dud. There are few of his tunes available to download via his label Leaf.

Symbol though is a little provocative: it’s composed to a large extent of samples of – mostly well-known – classical works. Classical mashups if you like. This is an idea I’ve always wanted someone to explore well, and by my reckoning Yokota would be the man to attempt it, so on one level I’m really pleased that he has. However, the first review I’ve read – in The Wire last month – was less than happy with the results. The BBC have three tracks available for streaming, and I’m left pretty ambivalent myself. The third track, ‘The Dying Black Swan’ is certainly the best of three – and I think stands up well to a lot of Yokota’s other work. It’s the only one of the three to completely eschew a beat, which has been the case with many of Yokota’s better tunes (much as I love the harder, housier things on 1999). The other two, ‘Purple Rose Minuet’ and ‘Song of the Sleeping Forest’ tread the fine line between inspired and naff; the limp beats on ‘Song’ definitely edging it towards the naff side. Pulling riffs from Debussy’s ‘Au clair de la lune’ at the start of ‘Minuet’ is also a pretty high risk strategy – to most people who’ve watched much British TV over the last few years it sounds like it could lapse quickly into an advert for soft cheese. The feel of the track is unmistakable Yokota – lots of lovely, rich loops, given the space to really sound – but his source material is just that bit too obvious. ‘Song’ relies much more on late 20th-century minimalism: plenty of Meredith Monk loops in here, plus some marimba riffs that I’m guessing are Reich. Yokota’s clear take on his material here make the mistake that minimalism is a comforting, relaxing, musical trend, rather than the radical, unsettling phenomenon that it is. Again this is a surprise from Yokota, since I’ve always felt that his strongest ambient work has been coloured with enough dark shades to keep it interesting, and here he’s been tempted to indulge in some cheap coffee house sounds.

‘The Dying Black Swan’ does keep that darker edge – the lack of an emphasised pulse keeps you unsettled, and a few of the samples don’t completely lock harmonically, making for some tangy clashes. On the strength of this, I’ll probably get the album when it comes out, so here’s hoping there’s more like it.

Leave a Comment

On An Overgrown Path: Classic misunderstandings – Hildegard

Have mentioned James Woods in the earlier post on the recent Sinfonietta concert, it’s pertinent to mention a couple of posts at On an Overgrown Path – the first reviews the world première of his opera Hildegard; the second a very amusing follow-up, revealing possible reasons for so many of the audience leaving at the interval…

Leave a Comment

GourmetBeats

Shout to Joe Nice of GourmetBeats Radio for sending me a CD of his dubstep show from back in March. Deep.

Leave a Comment

Spam Apology

On matters nothing to do with music, and little to do with copyright law (well actually… but then…), my attention has been drawn, via Technorati, to a ‘blog’ (I’m not going to honour it with a link) that seems to be pulling assorted bits of text from this site – in fact any site with the word ‘Rambler’ prominent – and publishing them, with links back here, there and everywhere. God knows why, but I fear it’s automated, and something sinister to do with spam; so, please usual spam rules apply – delete, don’t reply, etc. etc. – and please accept my apologies since this is nothing to do with me, and entirely out of my control. Thanks!

Leave a Comment

Hyperion feeling

I know I sniggered at Alex Ross’s recent post on the Hyperion saga, but there’s a serious point here that is being overlooked. And I also know that I’ve used words like ‘chilling’, ‘wreckage’, ‘awful’ in relation to the ruling against Hyperion, but I’ve been giving it more thought and revising my first reactions considerably.

First of all, I’m amazed at how many (at last count all but A.C. Douglas and me, although my thoughts have taken some time to crystallise admittedly) of the scholarly, writerly, creative side of the equation are instinctively siding with the record company, and against the scholarly, writerly, creative plaintiff. Personally, I’m pleased in many ways that for once, authorial control has been teased away from the record companies, and restored to those who actually work manuscript-in-hand. This is a Good Thing. Once again, the actual costs of this to the companies on a recording-by-recording basis (given that up until now it was assumed that Early Music was available scot-free) are not going to cripple the industry. Hyperion acknowledge this themselves. The reason they are in deep financial trouble is that they followed bad, and expensive, legal advice to appeal a case they had already comprehensively lost once already. For the sake of not paying Sawkins – and other editors like him – what will surely have been a pretty paltry sum, they’ve gambled and lost to the tune of several hundred thousand pounds (and, lest we forget, this is about paying money – Hyperion were happy to credit Sawkins in respect of authorship, but would not agree to pay him royalties). There are words for that sort of thing – let’s not get misty-eyed about this. I’m sorry that one of the better labels is going to suffer financially – I really am – but they must have had some knowledge of the serious risks they were taking for their relatively small gain.

Not all copyrights are the same. Copyright DOES NOT de facto mean all royalties for the work. Under existing (EU/European) law, as shown by this case, the work of an editor like Sawkins, has value. This is measured – more or less quantitatively if needs be (see a whole string of recent cases about illegally copying database information: Fixtures Marketing v OPAP (referred from Greece), Fixtures Marketing v Oy Veikkaus Ab (referred from Finland), Fixtures Marketing v Svenska Spel Ab (referred from Sweden) and British Horseracing Board v William Hill) – by the amount of work required to complete that work. Sawkins, as a scholarly professional, presumably put a lot of work – intellectual and physical – into preparing his editions of the scores. Just as, for example, Naxos’ engineers put a lot of work into their remastered Menuhin recordings (which, under EU law let’s not forget, are Naxos’ copyright, not ‘bad, evil’ Capitol’s, and we all applauded that decision, even if the specifics of US law have thwarted it for the time being). Sawkins, therefore, can legally claim some rights over the scores that Hyperion recorded: the court is not saying that Sawkins wrote Lalande’s piece: rather that he put a great deal of work into his edition, and it is that work that deserves to be recognised. Were Lalande still alive, or his work still under copyright, he or his estate would be entitled to a share of the rights too. A greater share (assuming that there was no conflict between Sawkins and Lalande himself over authorship of course, but that is an entirely different question). The biggest share, of course, goes to the record company, but let’s not let that get in the way of a good argument… If, on the other hand, Hyperion wanted to record Lalande’s works, and needed an edition (as, for example, has happened with publishers of Shakespeare, say), they would approach someone like Sawkins and commission an edition from him. If they wanted, having bought his work, they could write in their copyright ownership into the contract (they’d be fools not to), but they can not expect to get his work for free. What’s more, his name would be asserted as editor (again, NOT author) of the work in all subsequent performances, reprints and recordings. This is how life is: if you have made something that someone else values, you are entitled to request payment. You are, of course, equally entitled to choose to freely distribute your work in a variety of colours, but that decision must rest with the individual who has put the work in. As a fledgling professional academic myself, I’m cock-a-hoop for my early music colleagues that their endeavours are finally being recognised as valuable to the wider world.

So, Alex (and Marc Geelhoed) are correct on one count: their ‘corrected versions’ of Tristan and Beethoven 5 are, in some small part, copyrighted by them. Should things come to a legal dispute, I’m sure a judge would rule that the changes are protected by copyright only in a small way – and possibly, he would see through the whole thing and rule that a couple of minor tweaks that add neither discernable value nor artistic merit to established repertory pieces that have done very well for a hundred years or more do not constitute work of any value at all. (Sorry Alex and Marc, I’m just picking on you to make a point ;-) )

However, there is one essential point being missed here, and it is precisely why Sawkins’ editions warrants legal recognition, and some altered notes in Wagner or Beethoven don’t. Copyright is only meaningful if someone else sees value in that work. Sawkins’ Lalande edition clearly has value – the amount of money Hyperion were prepared to risk in order to retain their exclusive rights to its recording is as clear an indication of this as you will see. Alex’s Tristan refix is – I presume, but apologies Alex if I’m doing your work a grave injustice – of little value to anyone. Since we’re never going to hear that “brief xylophone solo in the King Mark scene” in commercial performance or recording, copyright in that version of the score is to all intents and purposes worthless.

[In the spirit of this whole post, credit where it's due to milady for links, fact checking, and several of the opinions expressed]

Leave a Comment

London Sinfonietta, Queen Elizabeth Hall, 23 May 2005

The last piece on the programme is Gérard Grisey’s Quatre chants pour franchir le seuil, one of the pieces in my Music Since 1960 series, so I’m going to talk about that separately in a post or two.

To be honest the other three pieces, James Wood’s Autumn Voices, 2001, Hans Abrahamsen’s Concerto for Piano and Orchestra, 2000, and George Benjamin’s Three Miniatures for solo violin, 2001, pale into a certain insignificance; but only because of the strength of their neighbour.

In order of size, then. Benjamin’s three miniatures, ‘Lullaby for Lalit’, ‘A Canon for Sally’ and ‘Lauer Lied’, were written for three friends of the composer. In a pre-concert discussion, Benjamin was keen to characterise them as extremely difficult pieces; Carolin Widmann, who was a particular star of the concert, brought them off well. The complexity of the pieces derives from Benjamin’s desire to add harmony to the solo violin line – not the implied harmony of Bach’s unaccompanied cello, but actual harmony. In the third movement in particular this required the soloist to maintain a steady ostinato accompaniment in left-hand pizzicato and a sustained arco song in the right. Impressive as this was – fireworks of a very gentle sort – for me the Lullaby was the most effective movement. Benjamin describes it as “a slow and simple melody, accompanied by open strings, which transforms into ribbons of harmonies at its end,” and the ribbons neatly switch around sustained common tones to produce the most purely harmonic music of the work.

Autumn Voices, another work requiring Widmann’s solo violin – this time with tape accompaniment – was particularly good. At 18 minutes, it’s a big work for such limited forces, and Widmann, spotlit in a dark auditorium, must take a great deal of credit for helping sustain such a span. Wood was asked before the concert about his choice of a tape over live electronics – “with live electronics so much can go wrong” – but there was a careful synergy between ‘dead’ tape and live performer written into the work. Although one could sense the passages in which a hidden pulse was needed to lock violin and tape together, this merely helped articulate and relate larger areas of the work. In the main the tape sounded between the violin notes, and chirruped and burbled like the broken pipe organ of some insect cathedral. I want to hear this again.

Abrahamsen’s Concerto was his first public work written after a ten-year period of almost complete compositional abstinence. The composer’s wife, Anne Marie Abildskov, was the soloist, and it was she who persuaded him that he could write the piece. It is, clearly, a considerably personal achievement, and this sense is reinforced by the large number of quotations, from Abrahamsen’s own works and by others such as Ligeti and Mahler – delving into those musical memories that sustained him during his creative silence perhaps? The opening of the piece “starts entirely as I usually start, with this filigree in the piano and many simultaneous layers.” It’s hard, with his wife as the intended soloist, not to imagine the composer participating as an active character in narrative of the piece. His embodiment is, therefore, the piano and it is a feature of the work that the piano plays almost constantly throughout – Abrahamsen is delighted with the one moment at which it stops: at the beginning of the fourth movement, a post-minimal filigree rather like the opening, “the piano stirs up an anthill”, takes a break, and for the first time listens to the orchestral music that falls away from its prompting. There is no programme to the work, but the circumstances of its composition and performance hint at readings like this. Unfortunately as a whole the work ends feeling a little slight, and in contrast with the Wood, too little made of much material – witness the end of the piece which felt like it had come a few minutes too early, and caught all of us on the hop.

Leave a Comment

Older Posts »