UE v IMSLP: more coverage

Boing Boing: German music publisher claims that nothing is public domain until its copyright runs out in every country

Michael Geist: Canadian Public Domain Told To Cease and Desist

Information Week: Does This Punishment Fit the Copyright Crime?

Scott Strader is also blogging the story.

Update: Daniel Wolf has some comment, and (possibly not unconnected) renews his call for publishers to produce free study scores.

The thrust of the Geist (and Boing Boing) posts is the one that should alarm us the most: that UE’s cease and desist was built upon the assumption that works published on the web should be subject not only to the copyright controls of the country of publication (in this case, Canada, where copyright in a musical work is life +50 years) but to the strictest controls encountered internationally (ie Europe, or life + 70 years). By this principle, the copyright laws of every country in the world (discussed, debated and decided upon as appropriate) can freely be tossed out of the window since we’ll all be subject to the law of whichever country is the strictest – be that the UK, the US, or Timbuktu. International copyright harmonisation is a hotly-debated topic at the moment, and remains contentious; it’s a pity to see it forcibly applied in a case such as this.

Update 2: ANABlog provides a level-headed summary of events, and a useful timeline:

 August 13 – Dr. Isabella Hangel from Universal’s copyright department sends a letter with two requests: 1) that Guo remove protected works from his site. She sends a detailed list of 70 compositions by Bartok, Berg, Friedman, Janacek, Mahler, Marx, Respighi, Schoenberg, Strauss, Szymanowski, and Zemlinsky; 2) that Guo sign a cease and desist agreement which provides for a 3,000 Euro penalty for each future infraction.

August 23 – Guo politely declines Hangel’s request via letter, citing his belief that Universal is employing an unproved interpretation of international copyright law.

October 5Ken Clark, a lawyer retained by Universal, sends Guo a letter that ups the ante by repeating Hangel’s original request for the removal of all protected material and includes a new request for an IP filtering system that disallows any non-Canadian from downloading scores. Clark sets a deadline of October 19 for compliance and warns that failure to comply will result in further action.

Keep watching this space.


3 thoughts on “UE v IMSLP: more coverage

  1. IMSLP was beyond reproach.
    It appears, that the New World Order, has gone after everything on the web.

    It is amazing what what those “volks” will do for a euro.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s