After Morgen und Abend

Morgen und Abend, Georg Friedrich Haas’s seventh opera, has just finished its premiere run at the Royal Opera House, Covent Garden. I went on the middle Saturday (21 November), and found I had quite a few things I wanted to say about it. I also wrote the introduction to Haas and his music for the programme book, so you can read the following according to how you think that might affect my partiality. To help me write that essay, I did have access to the libretto, as well as some in-house production notes. However, I didn’t hear a note of music in advance.

Morgen und Abend is based on Jon Fosse’s novel of the same name, with a libretto by Fosse himself. Its central character Johannes (Christoph Pohl) is a North Sea fisherman, the son of Olai (Klaus Maria Brandauer) and Signe (not seen). He has a daughter, also Signe (Sarah Wegener), and a wife, Erna (Helena Rasker). However, we encounter Johannes only at the beginning and end of his life: the moments of his birth and of his death, drawn out and placed under the microscope to emphasise their status as transitions, rather than singular points. Very little else happens dramatically.

Beckett-like, you might say. And Fosse’s libretto is full of the sorts of internal rhythms and repetitions that energise Beckett’s own writing:

Why is it so quiet
in there in the room
so strangely quiet
what can it mean
not a sound
and it’s my dear Signe
and the midwife
in there
what can it mean
what’s happening
When a child is born
it doesn’t go so quietly
I know that much
even as a man

But the work is also unlike Beckett; it is softer, flatter, unflecked with the Irishman’s dark jokes. The tragicomic absurdism of postwar Europe is replaced with a post-digital, 21st-century monochrome. This is reflected not least in the set and costumes, which are all of the same pale blue-grey. As always with Haas everything is in flux: chords continually evolve and devolve, form and collapse, the inevitability of decay providing the music’s essential drive and tempo. In many ways this is (or could have been) a perfect marriage of story and music: we see Johannes through the two fundamental transitions that define a person’s life.

151106_010620morgundab20adj20sarah20wegener20as20midwife20klaus20maria20brandauer20as20olai20c20roh20-20photo20clive20barda
Johannes is born

And in the second two-thirds of the opera, which deal with Johannes’ departure from life, this does work well. Fosse’s writing is at times breathtaking – ‘But even if it’s cold,’ dying Johannes says as he takes the hand of Erna’s ghost, who has come to guide him into the afterlife, ‘at least it’s there.’ – and Haas’s music often rises to the occasion. Moments with a flash of tubuular bells and a shimmer of keyed percussion stick particularly in the mind. And while the narrative is stripped back to its absolute bare bones, there are some gentle touches – such as Johannes and his friend Peter (Will Hartmann) reminiscing about cutting each others’ hair – that really lift it. In fact I think the text could have taken one or two more of these – something about Johannes’ daughter Signe, for example, perhaps even a memory of her birth to keep the loops going round.

The first third of the opera is much simpler: Johannes’ father Olai waits outside the bedroom, listening to his his wife is in labour. Until the end of this 30-minute scene, when the midwife announces Johannes’ birth, there are no entrances or exits. Even the one long entrance the scene is ostensibly about happens behind a closed door. Olai is nervous, and speaks his lines – in English, so without surtitles. This is important because his accent is thick, and some of his words get lost, especially those which are directed upstage, towards where the bedroom door is. One of these was the first statement of ‘midwife’, a rather important clue as to what was going on.

Haas chooses to set Olai’s monologue to some of his simplest music yet, long-held triads, sometimes blurred with glissandi or otherwise just moving through different orchestrations. Verticals are provided by short bursts of bass drumming by the two percussionists either side of the stage, presumably suggesting something like waves of contractions, but they were not nearly shaped clearly enough to carry much programmatic weight.

Worse, however, is Haas’s decision to have each of Olai’s lines delivered in isolation, with pauses of various lengths in between. This had the effect of stretching a few pages of libretto into half an hour while preserving the structure of Fosse’s text, and maintaining Olai’s monologuing presence. But it also emptied the words entirely of Fosse’s careful and purposeful rhythms. What bounced in writing dragged in sound.

On top of all this was the decision by Graham Vick to have Olai sit for the full 30 minutes. Not stand or move about, not pace up and down. Just sit and speak. He barely moves his arms, even – ironically it is only with the line “if only something would happen” that he shows signs of real agitation.

151110_0840-morgundab-adj-klaus-maria-brandauer-as-olai-c-roh-photo-clive-barda
Olai waits

So music, delivery, text setting, staging and direction are all downplaying it. Individually, none of these is a problem. All together is deathly, and tested even my Wandelweiser-tuned patience. Looking for something, I found myself transfixed by the contrast of the pinkness of Brandauer’s face against the otherwise uniform blue-grey.

Things improve enormously, however, when the midwife (also Wegener) enters. An entrance. And she sings! Suddenly the whole piece lifted off the ground. I’m not always convinced by opera as an artform, particularly a contemporary one, but in this moment it was just what was needed.

Morgen und Abend will be broadcast on Radio 3 on 5 December at 6.30pm.

Contemporary highlights in the ROH 2015/16 season

I don’t always pay attention to the season announcements from Covent Garden, but the release today of details of next year’s season caught my attention for two good reasons:

1) Georg Friedrich Haas: Morgen und Abend

I have my reservations about Haas’s music, yes, but he also does the big and dramatic better than most at the moment. Morgen und Abend, based on Jon Fosse’s novel Morgon og kveld, looks to hit all the key Haas themes: light/dark, mortality, decay. Graham Vick directs, too.

2) Philip Venables: 4.48 Psychosis

An adaptation of the fifth and last play by the late ‘in-yer-face‘ playwright Sarah Kane, author of the notorious Blasted. Venables has the right kind of form here – witness Fight Music, from his chamber opera Les Bâtisseurs D’Empire, which he describes as ‘absurdist cartoon horror’. Sarah Kane territory, then. Yet even by her own standards 4.48 Psychosis, a portrait of clinical depression completed shortly before Kane herself committed suicide, is a dark piece. A difficult one to bring to the operatic stage, but Venables is unlikely to shy away from its subject. I’m excited about this one.

In addition to these two new works, there are also forthcoming London premieres for Donnacha Dennehy’s The Last Hotel, Mark Simpson’s Pleasure, and Iain Bell’s In Parenthesis. The ROH’s production of Gerald Barry’s The Importance of Being Earnest from 2013 will also go to New York and the Barbican

Digging a hole at Covent Garden

(image by scillystuff)

Just what are the Royal Opera House up to?

In what is beginning to look at best like a rash move, Covent Garden’s ‘Head of Legal and Business Affairs’, George Avory, has launched a cease-and-desist campaign against hugely popular opera blogger Intermezzo. Intermezzo’s crime – from what can be made out from Avory’s curiously imprecise emails – is to post pictures of ROH set designs and other images taken within the theatre.

The story is taking on a life of its own beyond the classical blog/tweetosphere and could do some damage to the ROH’s wider reputation. It has already been picked up by the website of The Lawyer magazine, and as one commentor there observes,

for someone styled “Head of Legal and Business Affairs” to behave this way is bizarre – it betrays an apparent lack of legal understanding and a staggering lack of business acumen and commercial awareness.

So what’s going on? It’s hard to tell without at least knowing for certain exactly what copyright the ROH are trying to assert. In all likelihood, Intermezzo is probably in breach of some rule even if only the back-of-ticket request not to take photographs in the house, and has sensibly agreed to take any ROH images down.

But guilt isn’t really the issue here. At stake is something more important: the ROH’s relationship with its audience, both actual and (even more importantly) potential. A blog like Intermezzo’s is absolutely invaluable for communicating to new initiates the joy and passion of an artform like opera. Intermezzo herself points out the irony of the ROH’s actions at a time when their Chief Executive is boasting of bringing in new audiences. Opera, of all artforms, is heavily coded and baffling to those not familiar with its complex idiom: if it is to reach new audiences it needs as much mediation and commentary as it can get.

Such audience relationships are absolutely essential to the arts – in fact they ARE the arts. Certainly serious legal infringements need to be acted upon and copyright should be protected, particularly on behalf of the artists and creators who hold it. But it seems to me that in this case, once again, as in so many before it, the existence of a law has been misread as a compulsion to enforce it as forcefully as possible, to the exclusion of all reason and benefit. Remind me: who’s gaining from this?

Update 1: Copyright lawyer Matthew Taylor attempts to pick apart what actual regulations that may (or may not) be in play here, covering copyrights in buildings, performances, photographic reproductions of copyright works and more.

All told, I struggle to see how anybody would think there was an arguable case of copyright infringement here. Breach of contract – as noted above – is a possibility, but there’s nothing in the published correspondence to support such a broad ranging assertion of copyright, and claim of infringement.

Against that backdrop, perhaps it’s not surprising that I can find no trace of George Avory in the Law Society’s solicitor search or the Bar Directory.

Update 2: The ROH have issued an apology to Intermezzo [pdf], and fair play to them for acting quickly on that score. Intermezzo points out that there are still things to be resolved, which she is pursuing, but it does look as though the ROH are prepared to rectify any mistakes that have been made, even if the cleanest solution hasn’t yet been found.